|
Post by Carl Elder on Jun 5, 2008 7:25:09 GMT -5
I recently learned how to calculate how many calories you burn in a normal day not considering exercise. Note that this is an estimate and will be higher or lower depending on your body fat percentage.
1st: Multiply your weight in lbs by 4.3 2nd: Multiply your Height in inches by 4.7 3rd: Add these together plus 655 4th: Multiply your age in years by 4.3 5th: Subtract you result of your age calculation from step 3.
You can also use your lean body mass as your weight for a more accurate number. Unless you are severely overweight as fat does burn calories but at about 1/3 the rate as muscle. The most accurate way to determine lean body mass is a hydrostatic chamber, but a skin fold test can be fairly accurate as well.
In class the other day we did skinfold tests and I determined my fat percentage was 16% which is a tad above desired percentage for men. So my lean body mass is 195. With an ideal body fat percentage of 7% I got the following results.
Resting Metabolic Rate Lean Body Mass x 7% x 4.3 (195 X .07) = 208.65 X 4.3 = 897 Height (in) x 4.7 73 x 4.3 = 343 Sum of Ht. & Wt. Totals plus 655 Subtotal 1 1895 Age x 4.7 29 X 4.3 = 136 Subtotal 1 - Age Total RMR* 1759 calories per day *This number is if I did nothing but lay in bed all day.
To find the number of calories you would expend in a average unactive day add 30% of your RMR: 1759 + 30% = 2287
|
|
ninjamessiah
Black Belt
Strength, Discipline, and the Tae-Bo Way.
Posts: 173
|
Post by ninjamessiah on Jun 13, 2008 0:38:43 GMT -5
1. 165 x 4.3 = 709.5 2. 75 x 4.7 = 352.5 3. 709.5 + 352.5 + 655 = 1717 4. 24 x 4.3 = 103.2 5. 1717 - 103.2 = 1613.8
1613.8 x 30% = 2097.94
Interesting, I wish I had means of doing a skinfold test or one of those electronic thingies. Last year around this time my job had hired a health and wellness guy for everyone, he did some measurements and used one of those electronic thingies and I was sporting an impressive 6% body fat(probably closer to 10 or 12 now).
So, is it really as simple as burning more calories than you consume on a daily basis to lose fat? Or would that sacrifice muscle mass as well if you're not getting the proper amino acids?
|
|
|
Post by Carl Elder on Jun 13, 2008 6:42:20 GMT -5
Yeah to lose weight (Fat) you just want to burn more calories than you intake. However you dont want to intake to few calories, if you really cut back on you diet you will slow your metabolism down because your body goes into survival mode. So you will burn fat less efficently. The trick is to eat between your resting metabolic rate and you figure for a normal day.
Also by a strength training program will help burn fat as it will increase lean body mass which is more efficient at burning fat so it will increase metabolism. You wont necessarily lose weight though as muscle weighs more than fat you probably wont see much change in the scale. A strength training program and cardio program is the best way to burn fat. So unless your trying to maintain a certain weight or get down to a certain weight for competition that is what I would recommend.
Im trying to get down to 198 by this fall. After my last injury i got lazy and put on some weight and it needs to come off. So im planing on just doing cardio and eating more healthy.
|
|
ninjamessiah
Black Belt
Strength, Discipline, and the Tae-Bo Way.
Posts: 173
|
Post by ninjamessiah on Jun 17, 2008 16:21:26 GMT -5
I just read that it takes roughly 3500 calories burned to lose a pound of body fat. Hey, with all this calorie info, it's gonna be pretty easy to gauge my diet and exercise to cut off the excess flub.
|
|